US Woman Finds Offensive Message on Starbucks Cup Linked to Charlie Kirk

Middletown, Ohio | September 23, 2025 A customer in Middletown, Ohio, received an offensive note on her Starbucks cup after ordering a drink customized with the name “Charlie Kirk.” Autumn Perkins had ordered a Mint Majesty with two honeys to go at a Starbucks outlet inside a Kroger store on Sunday evening. When she picked up her drink, she noticed a message on the cup reading, “racist’s fav drink,” referencing Kirk’s political views. Perkins expressed her dismay, emphasizing the importance of respect even amid differing opinions. She immediately reported the incident to the store manager. Kroger, which operates the Starbucks location under license, confirmed that the employee responsible admitted to writing the note and was subsequently terminated. Perkins said she agreed with the dismissal, stating that everyone should be treated respectfully regardless of political beliefs. Starbucks issued a statement condemning the incident, highlighting that negative or offensive messages on cups violate their company policies and go against their mission to maintain a welcoming environment. The company reiterated that such behavior is unacceptable and does not reflect Starbucks’ values. The incident comes shortly after the tragic assassination of 31-year-old Charlie Kirk in Utah. Kirk was fatally shot while answering a question from an audience member at a campus event. Authorities have charged a 22-year-old technical college student from Utah in connection with the murder. Investigators continue to probe for the motive behind the attack. Perkins emphasized the need for civil discourse, saying, “We can disagree on many things, but we must respect each other. Disrespect only prevents communication and growth.” She added that the incident underscored the importance of accountability in workplaces, especially in situations where personal biases could influence professional conduct. This episode has drawn attention to the responsibilities of service employees and licensed outlets to uphold respectful customer interactions, regardless of political or personal views. It also serves as a reminder that companies and their partners are expected to act swiftly in addressing misconduct to maintain trust among patrons. While Starbucks and Kroger have acted promptly, the incident has sparked broader conversations about civility, workplace standards, and the impact of personal opinions on public-facing jobs. Perkins’ experience highlights the challenges that can arise when public figures become targets of political sentiment, even indirectly, in everyday scenarios. The investigation into Kirk’s assassination and the subsequent handling of the Starbucks incident demonstrate how recent events involving public figures continue to resonate nationwide, influencing social interactions, workplace accountability, and public discourse. Authorities have urged the public to avoid speculation regarding Kirk’s death and related incidents, emphasizing that investigations are ongoing to determine the motive behind the murder and ensure justice is served. This case reflects the intersection of workplace conduct, political polarization, and tragic national events, reminding society of the importance of professional integrity and mutual respect in public spaces.